Test-Driven Code Review: An Empirical StudyTechnical TrackIndustry Program
Test-Driven Code Review (TDR) is a code review practice in which a reviewer inspects a patch by examining the changed test code before the changed production code. Although this practice has been mentioned positively by practitioners in informal literature and interviews, there is no systematic knowledge of its effects, prevalence, problems, and advantages.
In this paper, we aim at empirically understanding whether this practice has an effect on code review effectiveness and how developers’ perceive TDR. We conduct (i) a controlled experiment with 93 developers that perform more than 150 reviews, and (ii) 9 semi-structured interviews and a survey with 103 respondents to gather information on how TDR is perceived. Key results from the experiment show that developers adopting TDR find the same proportion of defects in production code, but more in test code, at the expenses of fewer maintainability issues in production code. Furthermore, we found that most developers prefer to review production code as they deem it more critical and tests should follow from it. Moreover, general poor test code quality and no tool support hinder the adoption of TDR. Public preprint: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2551217, data and materials: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2553139.
Fri 31 May
|16:00 - 16:20|
Davide SpadiniDelft University of Technology, Netherlands, Fabio Palomba University of Zurich, Tobias BaumLeibniz Universit�t Hannover, Stefan HanenbergUniversity of Duisburg-Essen, Germany, Magiel BruntinkSoftware Improvement Group, Alberto BacchelliUniversity of ZurichPre-print Media Attached
|16:20 - 16:40|
|16:40 - 16:50|
Vladimir KovalenkoTU Delft, Nava TintarevDelft University of Technology, Evgeny PasynkovJetBrains GmbH, Christian BirdMicrosoft Research, Alberto BacchelliUniversity of ZurichDOI Pre-print
|16:50 - 17:00|
The Impact of Human Factors on the Participation Decision of Reviewers in Modern Code ReviewJournal-First
Shade RuangwanNara Institute of Science and Technology, Patanamon ThongtanunamThe University of Melbourne, Akinori IharaWakayama University, Kenichi MatsumotoNara Institute of Science and TechnologyDOI Pre-print
|17:00 - 17:20|